Comments for Trains https://www.trains.com/ Tue, 22 Jul 2025 07:52:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.2 Comment on Report: Goldman Sachs advising BNSF on potential merger by James Cooley https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/report-goldman-sachs-advising-bnsf-on-potential-merger/#comment-110785 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 07:52:48 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234210#comment-110785 So you want to go back to the days of the ICC/etc. where you could serve this city but not that city and you have frozen rates which means no body made money, plus labor strikes du jour.
You think the government can do better moving a box of widgets than the private sector?

]]>
Comment on Report: Goldman Sachs advising BNSF on potential merger by Güntürk Üstün https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/report-goldman-sachs-advising-bnsf-on-potential-merger/#comment-110784 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 04:13:01 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234210#comment-110784 Let’s recall that the rail business is both complex and surprising… Perhaps CSX might be a better fit for Union Pacific than NS… Note that any merger would require approval from the STB, which could take up to two years.

Dr. Güntürk Üstün

]]>
Comment on Report: Goldman Sachs advising BNSF on potential merger by MICHAEL LUSTIG https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/report-goldman-sachs-advising-bnsf-on-potential-merger/#comment-110783 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 03:14:49 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234210#comment-110783 At the risk of sounding like a broken record, bigger is not better. These big railroads cat manage what they have now.

]]>
Comment on Report: Goldman Sachs advising BNSF on potential merger by DAN FINDLAY https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/report-goldman-sachs-advising-bnsf-on-potential-merger/#comment-110782 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 01:49:29 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234210#comment-110782 There’s big money to be made, not earned mind you, but made doing these mergers and acquisitions. BNSF has the deep pockets of its parent company to outbid UP for its choice of partner. The trick to the whole affair will be buttering up the POTUS for easy regulatory approval.

]]>
Comment on Wabtec marks 10 years of Tier 4 locomotive success by Roger Thomas https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/wabtec-marks-10-years-of-tier-4-locomotive-success/#comment-110781 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 01:42:20 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234007#comment-110781 Tier 4 killed EMD/Progress as a supplier of new mainline locos for North American railroads.. As I understand it, EMD spent years trying to get their 2-cycle engine compliant, failed, and then built a new 4-cycle engine that was not fully debugged on release. I believe their Tier-4 loco was finally released in late 2017 to a tepid reception. Up faithfully bought 100 that were finally made more reliable, but I’m not sure any other Class 1 railroad has those in active use. I would be very surprised if any model manufacturer ever releases an EMD Tier 4.

]]>
Comment on Report: Goldman Sachs advising BNSF on potential merger by Justin Ritski https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/report-goldman-sachs-advising-bnsf-on-potential-merger/#comment-110780 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 01:41:56 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234210#comment-110780 Nothing will come of this, mergers are done.

]]>
Comment on Report: Goldman Sachs advising BNSF on potential merger by John Rice https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/report-goldman-sachs-advising-bnsf-on-potential-merger/#comment-110778 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 01:24:43 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234210#comment-110778 They can talk all day, nothing wrong with it, but its a cross not worth bearing.

]]>
Comment on Wabtec marks 10 years of Tier 4 locomotive success by Matthew Mcclure https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/wabtec-marks-10-years-of-tier-4-locomotive-success/#comment-110777 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 01:15:59 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234007#comment-110777 Ten years also of moving unionized jobs from Erie, PA to right-to-work-for-less TX. I’d be more impressed if skilled workers in TX had better protections, benefits, and pay. But then that is why Muskrat moved the Tesla HQ to TX to also undermine his laborers.

]]>
Comment on Report: Goldman Sachs advising BNSF on potential merger by GREGG SPINDLER https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/report-goldman-sachs-advising-bnsf-on-potential-merger/#comment-110776 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:40:48 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234210#comment-110776 Monoplists gotta do what monoplists do. An industry that hasn’t grown in 20 years with 40% margins doesn’t bode well for the customers, the public or environment. Trumpism will rubber stamp these monsterous mergers.

Government deregulation has utterly failed. Trains has trumpeted dereg as a great success for over 40 years, dutifully parroting industry PR. In reality, workers have taken a beating, customers have no choices, rates are priced ABOVE inflation and the executives and Wall Street rake in billions. IT HAS FAILED.

At some point the failed Reagan-Thatcher-Clinton neoliberalism will collapse on itself (just look around!) And 2 new monopolies will be easier to nationalize for the public good than a few dozen in Conrail’s day.

]]>
Comment on Lincoln Service, Floridian see extended cancellations by Howard Fine https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/lincoln-service-floridian-see-extended-cancellations/#comment-110775 Mon, 21 Jul 2025 23:16:34 +0000 https://www.trains.com/?post_type=trn&p=234121#comment-110775 In reply to Güntürk Üstün.

AI gunk, AMTRAK OWNS THE POST ROAD , stupid computer trash, and we have to pay to read this GUNK

]]>